Get e-book Why Are There No Arab Democracies?

Free download. Book file PDF easily for everyone and every device. You can download and read online Why Are There No Arab Democracies? file PDF Book only if you are registered here. And also you can download or read online all Book PDF file that related with Why Are There No Arab Democracies? book. Happy reading Why Are There No Arab Democracies? Bookeveryone. Download file Free Book PDF Why Are There No Arab Democracies? at Complete PDF Library. This Book have some digital formats such us :paperbook, ebook, kindle, epub, fb2 and another formats. Here is The CompletePDF Book Library. It's free to register here to get Book file PDF Why Are There No Arab Democracies? Pocket Guide.

Contents

  1. |||The 1st Inauguration
  2. more on this story
  3. FSI | CDDRL - Why is There No Arab Democracy?
  4. Why Are There No Arab Democracies?
  5. The Weak Foundations of Arab Democracy

Constitutional monarchy is a form of government in which a monarch acts as head of state within the guidelines of a constitution , whether it be a written, uncodified , or blended constitution. This form of government differs from absolute monarchy in which an absolute monarch serves as the source of power in the state and is not legally bound by any constitution and has the powers to regulate his or her respective government.

Democracy in the Arab World

Most constitutional monarchies employ a parliamentary system in which the monarch may have strictly ceremonial duties or may have reserve powers, depending on the constitution. Under most modern constitutional monarchies there is also a prime minister who is the head of government and exercises effective political power.

|||The 1st Inauguration

The Middle Eastern countries with Constitutional monarchies are generally considered democratic. For example: Jordan , Kuwait , Morocco , and Bahrain are considered constitutional monarchies.


  • Democracy's Past and Future: Why Are There No Arab Democracies?.
  • Why Western democracy can never work in the Middle East.
  • Site Search Navigation.
  • Discursive Approaches to Politeness!
  • Site Navigation!

The Iranian Revolution of resulted in an electoral system an Islamic Republic with a constitution , but the system has a limited democracy in practice. One of the main problems of Iran 's system is the consolidation of too much power in the hands of the Supreme Leader who is elected by Assembly of Experts for life unless the Assembly of Experts decides to remove him which has never happened. Another main problem is the closed loop in the electoral system, the elected Assembly of Experts elect the Supreme Leader of Iran , who appoints the members of the Guardian Council , who in turn vet the candidates for all elections including the elections for Assembly of Experts.

However some elections in Iran, as the election of city councils satisfies free and democratic election criteria to some extent. In other countries, the ideology usually out of power has fostered both pro-democratic and anti-democratic sentiments. The Justice and Development Party is a moderate democratic Islamist party that has come to power in traditionally secular Turkey. Its moderate ideology has been compared to Christian Democracy in Europe.

The United Iraqi Alliance , the winner of the recent elections in Iraq, is a coalition including many religious parties. Historically Iranians were ruled by an absolute monarchy for several thousand years , at least since the time of the Achaemenid Empire B. The Constitutional Revolution in replaced the absolute monarchy with a constitutional monarchy. The constitution went under several revisions during the following decades. The Shah also tried to modernize Iran's economy and westernize Iran's culture. These and other policies contributed to alienating nationalists, leftists, and religious groups.

The monarchy was overthrown in by the Iranian Revolution. In the same year a referendum was held by Ruhollah Khomeini , that asked whether there should be an 'Islamic Republic' or not. The constitution was modeled on the constitution of the French Fifth Republic by the Assembly of Experts for Constitution who were elected by direct popular vote and Khomeini made himself the new Supreme Leader of Iran. After Khomeini's death, the Assembly of Experts which is made of Islamic scholars elected by direct vote appointed Ali Khamenei as the new Supreme Leader.

Iran holds regular national elections by universal suffrage for all citizens regardless of race, religion, or sex, who are of voting age for electing the President , members of Parliament , Assembly of Experts , City and Village Councils where political parties support candidates. The current political system in Iran was designed to allow Iranians to decide their future by themselves without being oppressed by authorities, but in practice only allows a limited democracy.

One of the main problems of Iran 's system is the consolidation of too much power in the hands of the Supreme Leader who is elected by the Assembly of Experts for life unless the Assembly of Experts decides to remove him, which has never happened. The power of the Supreme Leader under Iran's constitution is almost unlimited and unrestricted in practice. This combined with the view that he is the representative of God held by some religious groups, being the head of the security and armed forces, and controlling the official state media the radio and television are restricted to state radio and television makes him immune from any kind of criticism and unchallengeable.

Critics of the system or the Supreme Leader are punished severely. Critical newspapers and political parties are closed, social and political activists like writers, journalists, human right activists, university students, union leaders, lawyers, and politicians are jailed for unreasonably long periods for making simple criticism against the Supreme Leader, the Islamic Republic system, Islam and Shia doctrines, the government, and other officials. They have been even threatened by death sentence though all such verdict in recent years have been dropped in higher courts in recent years and some have been assassinated by the Ministry of Intelligence and militias in the past no such case has been reported in recent years.

more on this story

Another main problem is the closed loop in the electoral system, the elected Assembly of Experts elects the Supreme Leader , so in theory he is elected indirectly by popular vote, but in practice the system does not satisfy the criteria for a free election since the Supreme Leader appoints the members of the Guardian Council who in turn vet the candidates for all elections including the elections for Assembly of Experts. This loop limits the possible candidates to those agreeing with the views held by Supreme Leader and he has the final say over all important issues.

Also the fourth unchangeable article of constitution states that all other articles of the constitution and all other laws are void if they violate Islamic rules, and the Guardian Council is given the duty of interpreting the constitution and verifying that all laws passed the parliament are not against Islamic laws. Many articles of constitution about political freedoms and minority rights e. Other problems include the issues with the rights of racial and religious minorities, influence and involvement of armed forces specially the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and Basij in political activities, widespread corruption in the ruling elite, problems with security forces like police and militias like Ansar-e Hezbollah , and corruption in Judiciary.

Polls in and [28] [29] [30] in Iran by a number of respected Western polling organizations showed that a considerable majority of Iranians supported the system, including the religious institutions, and trusted the system's handling of elections including the disputed presidential elections in Some Iranians and political activists dispute the results of these polls arguing that the results of these polls cannot be trusted because people fear to express their real opinion and the limitations on the follow of information allows the state to control the opinion of people living in more traditional parts of the country.

Some of these polling organizations have responded to these claims and defended their results as correctly showing the current [ when? The polls also showed a divide between the population living in large modern cities like Tehran and people living in other more traditional and conservative parts of the country like rural areas and smaller cities. Lebanon has traditionally enjoyed a confessional democratic system.

A large number of political parties with very different ideologies, are active in Lebanon, but most of them form political alliances with other groups of similar interests. Even though certain high-profile positions in the government and the seats in the parliament are reserved for specified sects, intense competition is usually expected of political parties and candidates.

In January , the Economist Intelligence Unit , released a report stating that Lebanon ranked the 2nd in Middle East and 98th out of countries worldwide for Democracy Index , which ranks countries according to election processes, pluralism, government functions, political participation, political cultures and fundamental freedoms. Israel is a parliamentary democracy represented by a large number of parties, with universal suffrage for all citizens, regardless of race, religion, sex, or sexual orientation, who are of voting age.

The Palestinian Authority operates presidential and parliamentary elections with universal suffrage for all citizens, regardless of race, religion, or sex, who are of voting age. However, no national elections have been held since the Fatah—Hamas conflict erupted into violence in The protests, uprisings and revolutions in the Middle East and North Africa, beginning on 18 December , brought about the overthrow of the Tunisian and Egyptian governments.

The Implications of the Israel/ Palestine Conflict Essay examples

Libya was brought into a 6-month civil war which brought about the end of Gaddafi 's year rule. Bahrain and Yemen are experiencing uprisings. The uprising in Syria led to full-scale civil war. Tunisia and Egypt have held elections that were considered fair by observers. Mohamed Morsi was sworn in as Egypt's first president to gain power through an election on 30 June ; however, after protests against him in June , as well as a hour deadline by the Egyptian Armed Forces to respond to the protesters' demands that he did not comply with, Morsi was removed from office in July Morsi's Defence Minister , Abdel Fattah el-Sisi , who served as a general in the Egyptian Armed Forces at the time, was responsible for announcing the overthrow on state television.

Research confirms that in general people in Islamic societies support democracy. Arab Socialism has also fostered secularism, though sometimes in what has been seen as a less democratic context. Secularism is not the same as freedom of religion , and secular governments have at times denied the rights of Islamists and other religious parties. A trend of a more liberal secularism supporting broader freedom of religion has developed recently in Turkey, while some Arab Socialist states have moved away from secularism to some extent, increasingly embracing religion, though many say without really increasing the rights of religious parties.

Lebanon also is a secular state. The reasons for the lack of democratization in the Middle East are outlined by analysts such as Albrecht Schnabel, who says that a strong civil society is required to produce leaders and mobilize the public around democratic duties, but in order for such a civil society to flourish, a democratic environment and process allowing freedom of expression and order is required in the first place. This theory therefore supports the intervention of outside countries, such as the U.

Externally supported creation of fragile, yet somewhat functioning institutions is meant to trigger the momentum needed to encourage the evolution of a functioning civil society. The latter will, after a few years of consolidation and post-conflict stability, produce the first wholly internally crafted government. At that time, external involvement, if still provided at that point, can cede. Other analysts draw different conclusions. Drawing from the work of Alexis de Tocqueville and Robert Putnam, these researchers suggest that independent, nongovernmental associations help foster a participatory form of governance.

They cite the lack of horizontal voluntary association as a reason for the persistence of authoritarianism in the region.

FSI | CDDRL - Why is There No Arab Democracy?

Therefore, the relationship of the state to civil society is one of the most important indicators of the chances of democracy evolving in a particular country. Some analysts point to MENA's saturation with Islam as an explanation for the region's failure to democratize. Other analysts believe that the failure of democratization results from the power of the state.

Inspired by Skopcol's work on revolution, [40] Belin [38] argues that democratic transition can only be carried out when the state's coercive apparatus lacks the will or capacity to crush opponents.

Why Are There No Arab Democracies?

Authoritarianism has been exceptionally robust in the MENA region because many of the states have proven willing and able to crush reform initiatives. Moreover, almost every Arab state has been directly involved in some form of international conflict over the past decades.


  • Is There Hope for Middle East Democracy? | Pulitzer Center.
  • Opinion: Eight Years Since Arab Spring, Is There Hope for Middle East Democracy?.
  • Why Are There No Arab Democracies? | University of St Andrews?
  • Share This;
  • The Devils Are Among Us: The War for Namibia.
  • Why Are There No Arab Democracies? | Journal of Democracy.

Research suggests that conflict involvement has a direct influence on the country's prospects for democratization. However, critics of these theories observe that some countries which experience many of these democracy-inhibiting factors are successful in their quest for democratization. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Main article: List of freedom indices. While the former proceeded to seize power and rule with an iron fist, the latter has quietly retreated to its barracks.

Government in Tunisia was thus left to the politicians, free from the overbearing presence of military men. Without their omnipresent shadow, politics has been able to evolve spontaneously amid the post-revolution uncertainty. Winning the constituent assembly elections in , it called for a national unity government, and proceeded to share power with two left- and liberal-leaning parties — the Congress for the Republic and the Democratic Forum — within what came to be known as the Troika.

This commitment to consensus-building has shielded Tunisia from the intense ideological polarisation that has scarred Egyptian political life, paving the way for the return of the old guard. This awareness of the complexity of transition and the dangers presented by the region have spared the country much bloodshed, helping keep its nascent democracy on track. Events in Tunisia are significant not only for its 11 million inhabitants, but for the wider region.

The Weak Foundations of Arab Democracy

The birth of this first fully fledged Arab democracy could offer a model of hope amid the feverish voices of despair and nihilism, and the backdrop of military dictators, corrupt theocrats and militant anarchists. Just as Tunisia showed Arabs the way out of the prison of dictatorship three years ago, today it is again demonstrating that on the ruins of the old order a democracy can be built, arduous as the road there may be. Topics Tunisia Opinion. Reuse this content. Order by newest oldest recommendations.